Browsing by Author "Crossley, Jane"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Optimising the biopiling of weathered hydrocarbons within a risk management framework - PROMISE.
    (2005-04-01T00:00:00Z) Pollard, Simon J. T.; Hough, Rupert L.; Brassington, Kirsty J.; Sinke, Anja; Crossley, Jane; Paton, Graeme I.; Semple, Kirk T.; Risdon, Graeme C.; Jackman, Simon J.; Bone, B.; Jacobsen, Christian; Lethbridge, Gordon
    Thirty years of research into petroleum microbiology and bioremediation have bypassed an important observation – that many hydrocarbon contaminated sites posing potential risks to human health harbour weathered, ‘mid-distillate’ or heavy oils (Pollard, 2003). Ex-situ biopiling is an important technology for treating soils contaminated with weathered hydrocarbons. However, its performance continues to be represented by reference to reductions in the hydrocarbon ‘load’ in the soils being treated, rather than reductions in the risks posed by the hydrocarbon contamination (Owens and Bourgouin, 2003; Tien et al., 1999). The absence of ‘risk’ from the vocabulary of many operators and remediation projects reduces stakeholder (regulatory, investor, landowner, and public) confidence in remediation technologies, and subsequently limits the market potential of these technologies. Stakeholder confidence in the biopiling of weathered hydrocarbons may therefore be improved by demonstrating process optimisation within a validated risk management framework. To address these issues, a consortium led by Cranfield University’s Integrated Waste Management Centre has secured funding from the Government’s Bioremediation LINK programme. Project PROMISE (involving BP, SecondSite Regeneration Ltd., Dew Remediation Ltd., TES Bretby (Mowlem Group), technology translators PERA, and academics from Aberdeen, Cranfield and Lancaster Universities) aims to improve market confidence in biopiling by demonstrating how this treatment may be applied within a risk m
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Optimising the biopiling of weathered hydrocarbons within a risk management framework.
    (2005-10-01T00:00:00Z) Hough, Rupert L.; Brassington, Kirsty J.; Sinke, Anja; Crossley, Jane; Paton, Graeme I.; Semple, Kirk T.; Risdon, Graeme C.; Jacobsen, Christian; Daly, Paddy; Jackman, Simon J.; Lethbridge, Gordon; Pollard, Simon J. T.
    Thirty years of research into petroleum microbiology and bioremediation have bypassed an important observation – that many hydrocarbon contaminated sites posing potential risks to human health harbour weathered, ‘mid-distillate’ or heavy oils rather than ‘fresh product’ (Pollard, 2003). Ex-situ biopiling is an important technology for treating soils contaminated with weathered hydrocarbons. However, its performance continues to be represented by reference to reductions in the hydrocarbon ‘load’ in the soils being treated, rather than reductions in the risks posed by the hydrocarbon contamination (Owens and Bourgouin, 2003; Tien et al., 1999). The absence of ‘risk’ from the vocabulary of many operators and remediation projects reduces stakeholder (regulatory, investor, landowner, and public) confidence in remediation technologies, and subsequently limits the market potential of these technologies. Stakeholder confidence in the biopiling of weathered hydrocarbons may be improved by demonstrating process optimisation within a validated risk man
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Weathered Hydrocarbon Wastes: A Risk Management Primer
    (Taylor & Francis, 2007-05-01T00:00:00Z) Brassington, Kirsty J.; Hough, Rupert L.; Paton, Graeme I.; Semple, Kirk T.; Risdon, Graeme C.; Crossley, Jane; Hay, I.; Askari, K.; Pollard, Simon J. T.
    We provide a primer and critical review of the characterization, risk assessment, and bioremediation of weathered hydrocarbons. Historically the remediation of soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons has been expressed in terms of reductions in total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) load rather than reductions in risk. There are several techniques by which petroleum hydrocarbons in soils can be characterized. Method development is often driven by the objectives of published risk assessment frameworks. Some frameworks stipulate analysis of a wide range of petroleum hydrocarbons; for example, the United Kingdom (UK) approach suggests compounds from EC5 to EC70 be examined. Methods for the extraction of petroleum hydrocarbons from soil samples have been reviewed extensively in the open literature. Although various extraction and analytical methods are available for petroleum hydrocarbons, their results suffer from inter-method variation, with gas chromatography methods being used widely. Currently, the implications for risk assessment are uncertain. Bioremediation works well for remediating soils contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. As a result, the optimization of environmental conditions is imperative. For petroleum hydrocarbons in soil, international regulatory guidance on the management of risks from contaminated sites is now emerging. There is also growing support for the move toward compound-specific risk-based approaches for the assessment of hydrocarbon-contaminated land.