Browsing by Author "Doytchinov, Iordan"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Alignment measurements uncertainties for large assemblies using probabilistic analysis techniques.(2017-12) Doytchinov, Iordan; Tonnellier, Xavier P.; Almond, HeatherBig science and ambitious industrial projects continually push forward with technical requirements beyond the grasp of conventional engineering techniques. Example of those are ultra-high precision requirements in the field of celestial telescopes, particle accelerators and aerospace industry. Such extreme requirements are limited largely by the capability of the metrology used, namely, it’s uncertainty in relation to the alignment tolerance required. The current work was initiated as part of Maria Curie European research project held at CERN, Geneva aiming to answer those challenges as related to future accelerators requiring alignment of 2 m large assemblies to tolerances in the 10 µm range. The thesis has found several gaps in current knowledge limiting such capability. Among those was the lack of application of state of the art uncertainty propagation methods in alignment measurements metrology. Another major limiting factor found was the lack of uncertainty statements in the thermal errors compensations applied to assembly’s alignment metrology. A novel methodology was developed by which mixture of probabilistic modelling and high precision traceable reference measurements were used to quantify both measurement and thermal models compensation uncertainty accurately. Results have shown that the suggested methodology can accurately predict CMM specific measurement uncertainty as well as thermal drift compensation made by empirical, FEM and FEM metamodels. The CMM task-specific measurement uncertainties made at metrology laboratory were validated to be of maximum 7.96 µm (1σ) for the largest 2 m assemblies. The analysis of the results further showed how using this method a ‘virtual twins’ of the engineering structures can be calibrated with the known uncertainty of thermal drift prediction behaviour in the micrometric range. Namely, the Empirical, FEM and FEM Metamodels uncertainties of predictions were validated to be of maximum: 8.7 µm (1σ), 11.28 µm (1σ) and 12.24 µm (1σ).Item Open Access Application of probabilistic modelling for the uncertainty evaluation of alignment measurements of large accelerator magnets assemblies(IOP, 2018-03-15) Doytchinov, Iordan; Tonnellier, Xavier; Shore, Paul; Nicquevert, Bertrand; Modena, Michele; Mainaud-Durand, HélèneMicrometric assembly and alignment requirements for future particle accelerators, and especially large assemblies, create the need for accurate uncertainty budgeting of alignment measurements. Measurements and uncertainties have to be accurately stated and traceable, to international standards, for metre-long sized assemblies, in the range of tens of µm. Indeed, these hundreds of assemblies will be produced and measured by several suppliers around the world, and will have to be integrated into a single machine. As part of the PACMAN project at CERN, we proposed and studied a practical application of probabilistic modelling of task-specific alignment uncertainty by applying a simulation by constraints calibration method. Using this method, we calibrated our measurement model using available data from ISO standardised tests (10360 series) for the metrology equipment. We combined this model with reference measurements and analysis of the measured data to quantify the actual specific uncertainty of each alignment measurement procedure. Our methodology was successfully validated against a calibrated and traceable 3D artefact as part of an international inter-laboratory study. The validated models were used to study the expected alignment uncertainty and important sensitivity factors in measuring the shortest and longest of the compact linear collider study assemblies, 0.54 m and 2.1 m respectively. In both cases, the laboratory alignment uncertainty was within the targeted uncertainty budget of 12 µm (68% confidence level). It was found that the remaining uncertainty budget for any additional alignment error compensations, such as the thermal drift error due to variation in machine operation heat load conditions, must be within 8.9 µm and 9.8 µm (68% confidence level) respectively.Item Open Access Thermal effects compensation and associated uncertainty for large magnet assembly precision alignment(Elsevier, 2019-06-12) Doytchinov, Iordan; Shore, Paul; Nicquevert, Bertrand; Tonnellier, Xavier; Heather, A.; Modena, MicheleBig science and ambitious industrial projects continually push technical requirements forward beyond the grasp of conventional engineering techniques. An example of these are the extremely tight micrometric assembly and alignment tolerances required in the field of celestial telescopes, particle accelerators, and the aerospace industry. Achieving such extreme requirements for large assemblies is limited, largely by the capability of the metrology used, namely, its uncertainty in relation to the alignment tolerance required. The current work described here was done as part of Maria Curie European research project held at CERN, Geneva. This related to future accelerators requiring the spatial alignment of several thousand, metre-plus large assemblies to a common datum within a targeted combined standard uncertainty (uctg(y)) of 12 μm. The current work has found several gaps in knowledge limiting such a capability. Among these was the lack of uncertainty statements for the thermal error compensation applied to correct for the assembly's dimensional instability, post metrology and during assembly and alignment. A novel methodology was developed by which a mixture of probabilistic modelling and high precision traceable reference measurements were used to quantify the uncertainty of the various thermal expansion models used namely: Empirical, Finite Element Method (FEM) models and FEM metamodels. Results have shown that the suggested methodology can accurately predict the uncertainty of the thermal deformation predictions made and thus compensations. The analysis of the results further showed how using this method a ‘digital twin’ of the engineering structure can be calibrated with known uncertainty of the thermal deformation behaviour predictions in the micrometric range. Namely, the Empirical, FEM and FEM metamodels combined standard uncertainties ( uc(y) ) of prediction were validated to be of maximum: 8.7 μm, 11.28 μm and 12.24 μm for the studied magnet assemblies.