Browsing by Author "Drury, D."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Estimating Pollutant Removal Requirements for Landfills in the UK: I. Benchmark Study and Characteristics of Waste Treatment Technologies
    (Taylor & Francis, 2006-12-01T00:00:00Z) Hall, D. H.; Drury, D.; Gronow, Jan R.; Rosevear, Alan; Pollard, Simon J. T.; Smith, Richard
    Introduction of the EU Landfill Directive is having a significant impact on waste management in the UK and in other member states that have relied on landfilling. This paper considers the length of the aftercare period required by the municipal solid waste streams that the UK will most probably generate following implementation of the Landfill Directive. Data were derived from literature to identify properties of residues from the most likely treatment processes and the probable management times these residues will require within the landfill environment were then modelled. Results suggest that for chloride the relevant water quality standard (250 mg l−1) will be achieved with a management period of 40 years and for lead (0.1 mg l−1), 240 years. This has considerable implications for the sustainability of landfill and suggests that current timescales for aftercare of landfills may be inadequ
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Estimating Pollutant Removal Requirements for Landfills in the UK: II. Model Development
    (Taylor & Francis, 2006-12-01T00:00:00Z) Hall, D. H.; Drury, D.; Gronow, Jan R.; Rosevear, Alan; Pollard, Simon J. T.; Smith, Richard
    A modelling methodology using a leachate source term has been produced for estimating the timescales for achieving environmental equilibrium status for landfilled waste. Results are reported as the period of active management required for modelled scenarios of non-flushed and flushed sites for a range of pre-filling treatments. The base scenario against which results were evaluated was raw municipal solid waste (MSW) for which only cadmium failed to reach equilibrium. Flushed raw MSW met our criteria for stabilisation with active leachate management for 40 years, subject to each of the leachate species being present at or below their average UK concentrations. Stable non-reactive wastes, meeting EU waste acceptance criteria, fared badly in the non-flushed scenario, with only two species stabilising after a management period within 1000 years and the majority requiring >2000 years of active leachate management. The flushing scenarios showed only a marginal improvement, with arsenic still persisting beyond 2000 years management even with an additional 500 mm y−1 of infiltration. The stabilisation time for mechanically sorted organic residues (without flushing) was high, and even with flushing, arsenic and chromium appeared to remain a problem. Two mechanical biological treatment (MBT) scenarios were examined, with medium and high intensity composting. Both were subjected to the non-flushing and flushing scenarios. The non-flushing case of both options fell short of the basic requirements of achieving equilibrium within decades. The intense composting option with minimal flushing appeared to create a scenario where equilibrium could be achieved. For incinerator bottom ash (raw and subjected to various treatments), antimony, copper, chloride and sulphate were the main controls on achieving equilibrium, irrespective of treatment type. Flushing at higher flushing rates (500 mm y−1) failed to demonstrate a significant reduction in the management period requi
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Estimating Pollutant Removal Requirements for Landfills in the UK: III. Policy Analysis and Operational Implications.
    (Taylor & Francis, 2007-01-01T00:00:00Z) Hall, D. H.; Drury, D.; Gronow, Jan R.; Pollard, Simon J. T.; Smith, Richard
    The policy analysis and management implications for achieving landfill equilibrium status within a sustainable timescale (decades rather than centuries) are presented based on modelled results reported previously. Until relatively recently, timescale estimates suggested that equilibrium or landfill completion could be achieved within 40-60 years i.e. the same order of magnitude as financial provision for aftercare. However results of modelling in this study (reported in previous paper) suggest that timescales may be considerably longer (many centuries in some instances) suggesting that financial provision may be inadequate. The role of the most promising and available waste treatment technologies and strategic waste management options in contributing towards achieving equilibrium status are discussed. Results suggest that a re- examination of techniques for accelerating landfill stabilisation, including aerobic and bioreactor landfill, is warranted.