MOSOF with NDCI: a cross-subsystem evaluation of an aircraft for an airline case scenario

Abstract

Designing cost-effective, reliable diagnostic sensor suites for complex assets remains challenging due to conflicting objectives across stakeholders. A holistic framework that integrates the Normalised Diagnostic Contribution Index (NDCI)—which scores sensors by separation power, severity sensitivity, and uniqueness—with a Multi-Objective Sensor Optimisation Framework (MOSOF) is presented. Using a high-fidelity virtual aircraft model coupling engine, fuel, electrical power system (EPS), and environmental control system (ECS), NDCI against minimum Redundancy-maximum Relevance (mRMR) is benchmarked under a rigorous nested cross-validation protocol. Across subsystems, NDCI yields more compact suites and higher diagnostic accuracy, notably for engine (88.6% vs. 69.0%) and ECS (67.7% vs. 52.0%). Then, a multi-objective optimisation reflecting an airline use-case (diagnostic performance, cost, reliability, and benefit-to-cost) is executed, identifying a practical Pareto-optimal ‘knee’ solution comprising 12–14 sensors. The recommended suite delivers a normalised performance of ≈0.69 at ≈USD36k with ≈145 kh MTBF, balancing the cross-subsystem information value with implementation constraints. The NDCI-MOSOF workflow provides a transparent, reproducible pathway from raw multi-sensor data to stakeholder-aware design decisions, and constitutes transferable evidence for model-based safety and certification processes in Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM). The limitations (simulation bias, cost/MTBF estimates), validation on rigs or in-service fleets, and extensions to prognostics objectives are discussed.