A systematic review of decision tools for process selection and performance improvement in manufacturing

Abstract

The growing complexity of manufacturing processes and the increasing diversity of decision-making tools present challenges in selecting effective approaches for process optimisation. Many existing tools are either too narrowly focused or inconsistently applied across sectors, limiting their broader impact. Additionally, the lack of clear integration strategies often hinders their full implementation in industrial settings. This systematic review examines decision-making tools that enable comparative assessments applied at the unit process level in manufacturing, covering both the selection between competing manufacturing routes and the optimisation of specific processes. A total of 37 journal articles were selected through a structured database search and evaluation process. The review analyses commonly used tools such as Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and Direct Comparison, highlighting their applications, benefits and limitations. Findings show that MCDA offers robust, multi-dimensional evaluations but is often constrained by complexity and data demands. In contrast, simpler methods like Direct Comparison provide more accessible insights but with a limited scope. Advanced tools such as Deep Learning and Computational Simulations hold promise but face challenges in scaling beyond the process level. Notably, there is limited integration of sustainability metrics within process-level decision-making. To address this, the study proposes a structured framework to guide future research and implementation, focusing on data management, AI integration and tool scalability. The results highlight the need for hybrid approaches that combine different tools to balance trade-offs and support long-term sustainability and operational efficiency in manufacturing systems.