A comparative assessment of alternative liquid hydrogen heat exchanger architectures for fuel preconditioning in turboshaft engines

Abstract

Heat exchanger integration is a key design consideration for engines adapted to run on hydrogen and requiring liquid hydrogen to be preheated prior to combustion. For a typical small turboshaft, a comparison is made of fuel heating via an intercooler, a recuperator, or both in combination. This steady-state, zero-dimensional thermodynamic assessment examines the overall performance effects of the heat exchanger installations, heat loads and setpoint temperatures. It shows that exhaust gas recuperation provides up to 15% SFC reduction relative to an engine using power offtake for fuel preconditioning, with an average reduction of 14% across the evaluated operating points. Fuel heating via an intercooler is constrained by off-design and low-temperature thermal management requirements, so it only gives modest SFC benefits and will reduce specific power unless the engine is substantially redesigned. Within the evaluated design space, the combined intercooled and recuperated arrangement does not provide the lowest SFC, but it offers a balanced heat load distribution that may help to mitigate the risk of local air-side icing in the heat exchangers. Unlike previous works that considered turbofan engine architectures, this study focuses on turboshaft and turbogenerator installations where shaft power objectives and operating constraints determine the relative merits of alternative heat exchanger integration strategies. It includes an assessment of potential effects on NOx emissions as well as SFC. The study provides guidance for preliminary design and sizing of heat exchangers for fuel thermal management, but analysis of transients in the cryogenic systems and detailed assessments of aircraft-level integration penalties will be specific to particular engine applications and are beyond the scope of the present study.