A study of accountability in two organizational learning frameworks: why accountability for learning is critical

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date published

Free to read from

Authors

Baxter, David
Colledge, Thomas
Turner, Neil

Supervisor/s

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Department

Course name

ISSN

1740-4754

Format

Citation

David Baxter, Thomas Colledge and Neil Turner. A study of accountability in two organizational learning frameworks: why accountability for learning is critical. European Management Review, 2017, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp319-332

Abstract

In this paper we examine the complex relationship between accountability and organizational learning through a case study with the UK Royal Air Force (RAF). Accountability is a complex and contradictory construct that has both positive and negative implications for organizational learning. Within the same organization we observed positive effects of accountability in one organizational learning system, and negative effects of accountability in another. This case study adds to the organizational learning and accountability literatures, showing that accountability to hierarchy, rather than preventing learning, can actually promote effective learning, making it more likely that people will report problems quickly and accurately and take follow-up action. This only applies if the learning objectives align with the broader accountability framework, and if reporting on failures will enhance individual reputation. If not, then people will tend to avoid reporting negative events in order to avoid punishment and reputation damage. Accountability to hierarchy is only negative if it conflicts with the learning objectives.

Description

Software Description

Software Language

Github

Keywords

Organizational Learning, Accountability, Repertory Grid, Public Sector, Defence, Royal Air Force

DOI

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Funder/s

Relationships

Relationships

Resources