Fireside corrosion behavior of thermally sprayed coatings for waste-to-energy power plant applications
dc.contributor.author | Usman, Ahmad | |
dc.contributor.author | Arrom, Luis Isern | |
dc.contributor.author | Nicholls, John R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cordero, Mario | |
dc.contributor.author | Syed, Adnan U. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-09T12:51:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-07-09T12:51:21Z | |
dc.date.freetoread | 2025-07-09 | |
dc.date.issued | 2025-12-31 | |
dc.date.pubOnline | 2025-07-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study investigates the fireside corrosion behavior of four (Ni-22Cr, Ni-25Cr, Co-25Cr, and NiCo-25Cr) coatings, which were applied using twin wire arc spray technique and subjected to simulated waste-burning environments (a gas composition containing HCl, SO2, CO2, N2, H2O, balance N2, plus a salt deposit of 50wt.% KCl + 50wt.% K2SO4). The coatings deposited on a conventional base steel alloy (E−250) were tested under these conditions at 550 °C for 500 h in a laboratory-scale atmosphere controlled furnace. After the fireside exposure, the samples were studied using optical microscopy, SEM-EDX, and XRD to deduce coatings performance and possible corrosion mechanisms. The results indicated that all coatings, except Ni-22Cr, outperformed the E−250 steel. The Ni-22Cr and NiCo-25Cr coatings showed similar pitting corrosion behavior with more prominent corrosion pits on Ni-22Cr coating’s surface. The Co-25Cr coating showed slightly improved performance to the above two coatings, which can be attributed to the ability of Co to resist corrosion attack under these conditions. Overall, the Ni-25Cr coating composition was conclusively found to be most effective. | |
dc.description.journalName | Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance | |
dc.identifier.citation | Usman A, Arrom LI, Nicholls J, et al., (2025) Fireside corrosion behavior of thermally sprayed coatings for waste-to-energy power plant applications. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Available online 01 July 2025 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1544-1024 | |
dc.identifier.elementsID | 673972 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1059-9495 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-025-11630-7 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/24174 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_UK |
dc.publisher.uri | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11665-025-11630-7 | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | 40 Engineering | en_UK |
dc.subject | Materials Engineering | en_UK |
dc.subject | 4017 Mechanical Engineering | en_UK |
dc.subject | Materials | en_UK |
dc.subject | Coatings | en_UK |
dc.subject | Coating | en_UK |
dc.subject | Corrosion | en_UK |
dc.subject | Metals and Alloys | en_UK |
dc.subject | Steel, Light Metal | en_UK |
dc.title | Fireside corrosion behavior of thermally sprayed coatings for waste-to-energy power plant applications | en_UK |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.type.subtype | Article | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2025-06-06 |