CERESResearch Repository

Evaluating biological realism in ecological modelling: application of a novel framework to compare mechanistic and process-based earthworm and wild pollinator population models

dc.contributor.authorGold, Harriet M.
dc.contributor.authorHannam, Jacqueline A.
dc.contributor.authorPotts, Simon G.
dc.contributor.authorBrittain, Claire
dc.contributor.authorGalic, Nika
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Alice S. A.
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-19T14:53:16Z
dc.date.available2025-11-19T14:53:16Z
dc.date.freetoread2025-11-19
dc.date.issued2026-02-01
dc.date.pubOnline2025-11-10
dc.description.abstractEcological models can support land management decisions and optimisation schemes that need to account for invertebrate population responses at the field to landscape level. However, models that incorporate greater biological detail (e.g. individual-level physiological and behavioural responses) often become computationally intractable at larger spatial extents. Such trade-offs in model development lead to ad hoc model design for different species and management questions, hindering generalisable insights needed to advance predictive ecological models for decision support. To facilitate model comparison, we developed and applied a novel approach to quantify the biological realism of models for two functionally important invertebrate groups commonly targeted by management interventions. Mechanistic and process-based population models for earthworms (n = 23) and wild pollinators (n = 24) were identified through a structured review. We find that earthworm models are predominantly non-spatial or micro-scale (<10 m extent) and often incorporate detailed physiological mechanisms. Pollinator models frequently simulate landscape-scale scenarios (≥1 km extent) and typically rely on aggregated processes to predict population dynamics or crop visitation rates, although some include detailed individual-level movement behaviours. Species- and scale-specific model structures highlight the need for greater integration of physiological and behavioural mechanisms across broader spatial extents. We recommend systematic strategies to build on the progress made by existing models, aiming to resolve the trade-off between realism and tractability for more informed population predictions at management-relevant spatial scales. Our framework complements existing efforts towards greater transparency in model development, communication, and application for robust environmental decision support.
dc.description.journalNameEcological Modelling
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by UKRI BBSRC FoodBioSystems Doctoral Training Partnership (DTP), grant number BB/T008776/1 and CASE support from Syngenta.
dc.identifier.citationGold HM, Hannam JA, Potts SG, et al., (2026) Evaluating biological realism in ecological modelling: application of a novel framework to compare mechanistic and process-based earthworm and wild pollinator population models. Ecological Modelling, Volume 512, February 2026, Article number 111399en_UK
dc.identifier.elementsID866498
dc.identifier.issn0304-3800
dc.identifier.paperNo111399
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111399
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/24669
dc.identifier.volumeNo512
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.publisher.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025003850?via%3Dihub
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectEcologyen_UK
dc.subjectEmergenceen_UK
dc.subjectPhysiologyen_UK
dc.subjectBehaviouren_UK
dc.subjectDispersalen_UK
dc.subjectDecision supporten_UK
dc.subjectModel classificationen_UK
dc.titleEvaluating biological realism in ecological modelling: application of a novel framework to compare mechanistic and process-based earthworm and wild pollinator population modelsen_UK
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-11-01

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Evaluating_biological_realism-2025.pdf
Size:
2.54 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: