Comparative analysis of blast prediction software for far-field shock wave effects behind a blast wall
dc.contributor.author | Chester, Alastair | |
dc.contributor.author | Hazael, Rachael | |
dc.contributor.author | Critchley, Richard | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-27T11:04:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-11-27T11:04:56Z | |
dc.date.freetoread | 2024-11-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-12-31 | |
dc.date.pubOnline | 2024-09-12 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper investigates a selection of current and emerging software used in the prediction of overpressure generated through the detonation of a high explosive in the far field behind a blast wall. In particular, this paper compares the software Autodyn, blastFoam, ProSAir, Viper::Blast and WALAIR++. These packages are compared by simulating a 100 kg TNT explosive charge at a stand-off distance of 25 m from a complex structure, then reviewing the performance in terms of the overpressure results, speed of each modelling package, the degree of effect from mesh, and domain sizes and ease of use. A live experimental trial representing the simulation was also performed, although it used a similar but different explosive, for a high-level comparison. The live-trial instrumentation design details are reviewed and compared with best practice. The choice of software is found to lead to variations in peak pressure predictions of 28%, specific impulse by 10% and the simulation speed can vary by a factor of up to 1600 for this type of study. This shows that the choice of blast software package can have a significant impact on the accuracy and attainability of blast predictions. | |
dc.description.journalName | International Journal of Protective Structures | |
dc.identifier.citation | Chester A, Hazael R, Critchley R. (2024) Comparative analysis of blast prediction software for far-field shock wave effects behind a blast wall. International Journal of Protective Structures, Available online 12 September 2024 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2041-420X | |
dc.identifier.elementsID | 552322 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2041-4196 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1177/20414196241284299 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/23229 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | SAGE | |
dc.publisher.uri | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20414196241284299 | |
dc.relation.isreferencedby | https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/22900 | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | simulation | |
dc.subject | blast testing | |
dc.subject | computational modelling | |
dc.subject | high explosives | |
dc.subject | 4005 Civil Engineering | |
dc.subject | 40 Engineering | |
dc.subject | 4016 Materials Engineering | |
dc.subject | 4017 Mechanical Engineering | |
dc.subject | Bioengineering | |
dc.subject | 4005 Civil engineering | |
dc.subject | 4016 Materials engineering | |
dc.subject | 4017 Mechanical engineering | |
dc.title | Comparative analysis of blast prediction software for far-field shock wave effects behind a blast wall | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.type.subtype | Journal Article | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2024-08-20 |