Impacts of long-term application of best management practices on yields and root carbohydrate content in asparagus (Asparagus officinalis) (UK)

dc.contributor.authorMašková, Lucie
dc.contributor.authorSimmons, Robert W.
dc.contributor.authorDeeks, Lynda K.
dc.contributor.authorDe Baets, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorDrost, Daniel T.
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-20T11:41:26Z
dc.date.available2023-04-20T11:41:26Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-20
dc.description.abstractYield physiology of asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) is strongly influenced by biotic factors such as crown and root rot caused by Fusarium spp. and by abiotic conditions such as precipitation or temperatures, duration of each harvest, and field management practices. Asparagus yields are linked to the availability of soluble carbohydrates (CHO) in the storage root system which is considered a key factor in asparagus productivity. The aim of this study was to quantify the impacts of the long-term application of a range of potential Best Management Practices (BMPs) on yield and storage root carbohydrate content in green asparagus in a long-term field trial. The trial was established in 2016 with the asparagus ‘Gijnlim’ variety. Commercial yields were collected in 2018, 2019 and 2020. Root carbohydrate content was determined in 2019 and 2020. BMPs included (1) companion crops - Rye (Secale cereale L.), Mustard (Sinapis alba L.), (2) interrow surface mulch applications of either straw mulch or PAS 100 compost (Publicly available specification) in combination with shallow soil disturbance (SSD), (3) the conventional practice and modifications of the conventional tillage practice by applying SSD or not applying SSD and (4) a zero-tillage option. Annual re-ridging (R) and not ridging (NR) were applied to BMP options 1–3. SSD had no significant impact on asparagus yields while annual re-ridging negatively affected total yields of treatments with bare soil interrows, which were managed without SSD. Conventional practice was associated with a 22% yield reduction and ∼€4250 ha−1 annual loss in potential revenue as compared to the Zero-tillage treatment. Companion cropping with mustard did not have a significant impact on asparagus yields. Rye without annual re-ridging was however associated with yield reductions of > 20% as compared to the Conventional practice. PAS 100 Compost applied in asparagus interrows (at 25 t ha−1 per year) in combination with SSD without annual re-ridging resulted in improvements to yields of 20%, 10% and 34% in 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively, as compared to the Conventional practice. No correlation was observed between storage root soluble carbohydrate content and asparagus yields. The results of this study confirmed that asparagus yield, and thus total farm income can be significantly improved through implementation of several of the BMPs investigated.en_UK
dc.description.sponsorshipAgriculture and Horticulture Development Board (Project FV450a and FV450b)en_UK
dc.identifier.citationMašková L, Simmons RW, Deeks LK, et al., (2023) Impacts of long-term application of best management practices on yields and root carbohydrate content in asparagus (Asparagus officinalis) (UK), European Journal of Agronomy, Volume 147, July 2023, Article number 126828en_UK
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7331
dc.identifier.issn1161-0301
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.126828
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/19518
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectAsparagus officinalis L.en_UK
dc.subjectSpear weighten_UK
dc.subjectComposten_UK
dc.subjectCompanion cropsen_UK
dc.subjectSecale cereale L.en_UK
dc.subjectRoot soluble carbohydrateen_UK
dc.titleImpacts of long-term application of best management practices on yields and root carbohydrate content in asparagus (Asparagus officinalis) (UK)en_UK
dc.typeArticleen_UK

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Yields_and_root_carbohydrate_content-2023.pdf
Size:
1.34 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: