Isothermal temperature control for battery testing and battery model parameterization

dc.contributor.authorHales, Alister
dc.contributor.authorBrouillet, Etienne
dc.contributor.authorWang, Zhihuo
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Blair
dc.contributor.authorSamieian, Mohammad Amin
dc.contributor.authorKay, Jake
dc.contributor.authorMores, Stelios
dc.contributor.authorAuger, Daniel J.
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Yatish
dc.contributor.authorOffer, Gregory
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-24T11:45:50Z
dc.date.available2022-03-24T11:45:50Z
dc.date.freetoread2022-03-24
dc.date.issued2021-04-27
dc.date.pubOnline2021-04-27
dc.description.abstractThe hybrid/ electric vehicle (H/EV) market is very dependent on battery models. Battery models inform cell and battery pack design, critical in online battery management systems and can be used as predictive tools to maximise the lifetime of a battery pack. Battery models require parameterization, through experimentation. Temperature affects every aspect of a battery’s operation and must therefore be closely controlled throughout all battery experiments. Today, the private-sector prefers climate chambers for experimental thermal control. However, evidence suggests that climate chambers are unable to adequately control the surface temperature of a battery under test. In this study, laboratory apparatus is introduced that controls the temperature of any exposed surface of a battery through conduction. Pulse discharge tests, temperature step change tests and driving cycle tests are used to compare the performance of this conductive temperature control apparatus (CTCA) against a climate chamber across a range of scenarios. The CTCA outperforms the climate chamber in all tests. In CTCA testing, the rate of heat removal from the cell is increased by two orders of magnitude. The CTCA eliminates error due to cell surface temperature rise, which is inherent to climate chamber testing due to insufficient heat removal rates from a cell under test. The CTCA can reduce the time taken to conduct entropic parameterization of a cell by almost 10 days, a 70% reduction in the presented case. Presently, the H/EV industry’s reliance on climate chambers is impacting the accuracy of all battery models. The industry must move away from the flawed concept of convective cooling during battery parameterization.en_UK
dc.description.journalNameSAE International Journal of Electrified Vehicles
dc.format.extent105-122
dc.identifier.citationHales A, Brouillet E, Wang Z, et al., (2022) Isothermal temperature control for battery testing and battery model parameterization. SAE International Journal of Electrified Vehicles, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp. 105-122en_UK
dc.identifier.issn2691-3747
dc.identifier.issueNo2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4271/14-10-02-0008
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/17678
dc.identifier.volumeNo10
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSociety of Automotive Engineersen_UK
dc.subjectLithium-ion batteryen_UK
dc.subjectbattery testingen_UK
dc.subjectbattery model parameterizationen_UK
dc.subjectisothermal battery testingen_UK
dc.subjectclimate chambersen_UK
dc.subjectconductive coolingen_UK
dc.subjectconvection coolingen_UK
dc.subjecttemperature controlen_UK
dc.subjecttemperature boundary conditionsen_UK
dc.titleIsothermal temperature control for battery testing and battery model parameterizationen_UK
dc.typeArticleen_UK

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Isothermal_temperature_control_for_battery_testing-2022.pdf
Size:
1.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: