ProBCA Taxonomy of Discrete MCDA Methods for Ranking
Files
Date published
Free to read from
Supervisor/s
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Department
Course name
Type
ISSN
Format
Citation
Abstract
This book is accompanied by the publication titled 'A SYNOPTIC TAXONOMY OF DISCRETE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS METHODS FOR RANKING', which introduces the presented taxonomy for MADM (Multi-Attribute Decision-Making) methods for ranking tasks. The taxonomy consists of: - the collection of 300 MADM methods covering the various parts of a typical MCDA (Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis) process; - the characterisation system for the recorded methods called ProBCA (Problem-Based Characterisation Approach). The title (ProBCA) reflects an application-oriented mindset that the presented taxonomy is based on. It focuses on the DP (Decision Problem) parameters and how the DM (Decision Maker) deals with it to describe the presented methods, rather than the intrinsic characteristics of the methods itself. The taxonomy is operated by picking from the list of available values for each of the 17 descriptor parameters characterising the possible DP context specifics and DM constraints. If a method (or several) matching the provided DP characterisation is available in the presented collection, it will remain visible after filtering for appropriate values while the remaining methods will become hidden. It is possible to use partial DP characterisation to identify a range of potentially suitable methods if the DM is flexible about theof defining define the DP and how to approach its solution. The number of methods matching each of the available characterising values is always shown next to these values in the top section of the taonomy, and is progressively updated as the DM proceeds with value selection. The taxonomy is dedicated to allow a broad spectrum of DMs to efficiently select the most appropriate MADM method for their ranking DP at hand.
Description
Software Description
Software Language
Github
Keywords
DOI
Rights
Funder/s
Relationships
Relationships
Resources
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2618-3_5
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105317
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.076
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00995887
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2003.809354
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-843-7
https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10
https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2010.52
https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2010.307
https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2021083
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0767-1_17
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1984.6313267
https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2019.1633964
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.08.119
https://doi.org/10.1080/05695557208974822
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00026
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
https://doi.org/10.3390/math9161881
https://doi.org/10.1086/208721
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.130
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.01.008
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.01.013
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2008.03.047
https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v23i8.7
https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2019.B3.beliakov
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2009.07.016
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2019.04.008
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23081-5_14
https://doi.org/10.24818/18423264/54.2.20.04
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101948
https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458
https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.11309
https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1525
https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.3
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.06.009
https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2014.1274
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.02.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.069
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2383-0_3
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047832
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.04.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.010
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.06.005
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0390-5
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.017
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032955
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.01.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.03.045
https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.2015.1083863
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92828-7_13
https://doi.org/10.1109/21.259681
https://doi.org/10.1068/b090
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622011004713
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.031
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.163
https://doi.org/10.2495/SC150231
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-00444-2
https://doi.org/10.1109/SMDCM.2011.5949271
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10090393
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2007.09.009
https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1994.11518029
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.006
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-819-7
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1814389
https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1723
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-013-0311-x
https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12475
https://doi.org/10.1108/09576060210411521
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.009
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622016500036
https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.752789
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/305/1/012003
https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1975.9765
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.034
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622014500825
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622017500274
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.11.013
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2013.05.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2015.10.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.05.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.009i
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114686
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105893
https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.40.6.1053
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.004
https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2016.1150363
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.09.003