CERESResearch Repository

Installed nacelle aerodynamics at cruise and windmilling conditions

dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Moreno, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorMacManus, David
dc.contributor.authorTejero, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorHueso Rebassa, Josep
dc.contributor.authorSheaf, Christopher T.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-16T09:46:08Z
dc.date.available2024-07-16T09:46:08Z
dc.date.freetoread2024-07-16
dc.date.issued2024-08-07
dc.date.pubOnline2024-07-11
dc.description.abstractPurpose The decrease in specific thrust achieved by Ultra-High Bypass Ratio (UHBPR) aero-engines allows for a reduction in specific fuel consumption. However, the typical associated larger fan size might increase the nacelle drag, weight and the detrimental interference effects with the airframe. Consequently, the benefits from the new UHBPR aero-engine cycle may be eroded. This paper aims to evaluate the potential improvement in the aerodynamic performance of compact nacelles for installed aero-engine configuration. Design/methodology/approach Drooped and scarfed non-axisymmetric compact and conventional nacelle designs were down selected from a multi-point CFD-based optimisation. These were computationally assessed at a set of installation positions on a contemporary wide-body, twin-engine transonic aircraft. Both cruise and off-design conditions were evaluated. A thrust and drag accounting method was applied to evaluate different aircraft, powerplant and nacelle performance metrics. Findings The aircraft with the compact nacelle configuration installed at a typical installation position provided a reduction in aircraft cruise fuel consumption of 0.44% relative to the conventional architecture. However, at the same installation position, the compact design exhibits a large flow separation at windmilling conditions that is translated into an overall aircraft drag penalty of approximately 5.6% of the standard cruise net thrust. Additionally, the interference effects of a compact nacelle are more sensitive to deviations in mass flow capture ratio (MFCR) from the nominal windmilling diversion condition. Originality/value This work provides a comprehensive analysis of not only the performance but also the aerodynamics at an aircraft level of compact nacelles compared to conventional configurations for a range of installations positions at cruise. Additionally, the engine-airframe integration aerodynamics is assessed at an off-design windmilling condition which constitutes a key novelty of this paper.
dc.description.journalNameAircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology
dc.format.extentpp. 757-768
dc.identifier.citationSánchez-Moreno F, MacManus D, Tejero F, et al., (2024) Installed nacelle aerodynamics at cruise and windmilling conditions. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, Volume 96, Issue 6, August 2024, pp. 757-768en_UK
dc.identifier.issn1748-8842
dc.identifier.issueNo6
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-03-2023-0070
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/22642
dc.identifier.volumeNo96
dc.identifier.volumeNo96
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEmeralden_UK
dc.publisher.urihttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AEAT-03-2023-0070/full/html
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectnacelleen_UK
dc.subjectaerodynamicsen_UK
dc.subjectengine-airframe integrationen_UK
dc.subjectinterference effectsen_UK
dc.subjectcomputational fluid dynamicsen_UK
dc.subjectwindmillingen_UK
dc.titleInstalled nacelle aerodynamics at cruise and windmilling conditionsen_UK
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-04-25

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Installed_nacelle_aerodynamics-2024.pdf
Size:
4.78 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: